How to post, how to add pics, how to add an attachment, and how to share a YouTube video...


Author Topic: Tail post size  (Read 4361 times)

Offline ultra

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 23
  • Total likes: 0
  • Newbie
  • OS:
  • Windows NT 10.0 Windows NT 10.0
  • Browser:
  • Chrome 58.0.3029.96 Chrome 58.0.3029.96
Tail post size
« on: May 07, 2017, 11:33:09 PM »
I seem to have used a 3/4 inch x .035 wall tube as the tail post to my frame instead of a 7/8 tube.

There is a page in the plans that specifies the 7/8 is optional and that I could use 3/4 inch tubing, will I run into any problems later on in my build?

Offline Tom XL-7

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 226
  • Total likes: 31
  • Tom XL-7
  • OS:
  • Windows NT 10.0 Windows NT 10.0
  • Browser:
  • Chrome 58.0.3029.96 Chrome 58.0.3029.96
  • Eagle Type: XL
Re: Tail post size
« Reply #1 on: May 08, 2017, 04:06:29 AM »
Look at page 25 on your XL plans 
Shows a little bit of 7/8 added to act as a socket to receive the 3/4 alum tail.
The 7/8 option would be heavier but simpler.
Tom XL-7

Offline ultra

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 23
  • Total likes: 0
  • Newbie
  • OS:
  • Windows NT 10.0 Windows NT 10.0
  • Browser:
  • Chrome 58.0.3029.96 Chrome 58.0.3029.96
Re: Tail post size
« Reply #2 on: May 08, 2017, 06:34:05 PM »
Look at page 25 on your XL plans
Shows a little bit of 7/8 added to act as a socket to receive the 3/4 alum tail.
The 7/8 option would be heavier but simpler.
Tom XL-7

Thanks, I think I'll just keep the 3/4 inch post for now.

On another note I have about $40 worth of off cuts of chromemoly tubing. Is it structurally safe for me to weld them end to end to make a longer piece to use in the frame?

Offline scottiniowa

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 497
  • Total likes: 99
  • Scott-In-Iowa
  • OS:
  • Mac OS X 10.7.5 Mac OS X 10.7.5
  • Browser:
  • Safari 6.1.6 Safari 6.1.6
    • Display of helpful hits and tricks
  • Eagle Type: Legal E- XL
Re: Tail post size
« Reply #3 on: May 09, 2017, 06:59:32 AM »
On another note I have about $40 worth of off cuts of chromemoly tubing. Is it structurally safe for me to weld them end to end to make a longer piece to use in the frame?

Ultra- I think this was your question and not Tom’s

first, you never weld tubing end to end for a structural piece.  Look up scarf joint, for a much better explanation. but in the end, if your labor is anything at all, you wouldn’t earn $1-2.00 per hour in savings.  Hardly worth it.

Now for #2,  This takes time, but using a XL spread sheet really makes this work.  
     from your plans, you take all the longest pieces and write them down..   This might be one cut per length to get this piece, but you have on your spread sheet, what you have left (remainder of the length)
      Then you take the next longest required part,  either this comes out of a new length or one of the remainders from above.
       Pretty soon you have shorter and shorter lengths required for frame, but are taking these out of the remainders from above.

      This works for each tubing size…  it really works out well, of course what makes a mess, is if you cut a piece to full required  length and either have your measurement wrong, or  cut the piece wrong.  Either way, you soon learn to NOT DO THAT again.  ;-)  

      This works for any size of aircraft frame.  The pile of scrap left over is very small.

    Preplanning is your friend here for both time and dollars.

Best of success.
best email address:  irondesignairparts@gmail.com

Offline scottiniowa

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 497
  • Total likes: 99
  • Scott-In-Iowa
  • OS:
  • Mac OS X 10.7.5 Mac OS X 10.7.5
  • Browser:
  • Safari 6.1.6 Safari 6.1.6
    • Display of helpful hits and tricks
  • Eagle Type: Legal E- XL
Re: Tail post size
« Reply #4 on: May 09, 2017, 07:38:55 PM »
On another note I have about $40 worth of off cuts of chromemoly tubing. Is it structurally safe for me to weld them end to end to make a longer piece to use in the frame?





Ultra- I think this was your question and not Tom’s

first, you never weld tubing end to end for a structural piece.  Look up scarf joint, for a much better explanation. but in the end, if your labor is anything at all, you wouldn’t earn $1-2.00 per hour in savings.  Hardly worth it.

Now for #2,  This takes time, but using a XL spread sheet really makes this work.  
    from your plans, you take all the longest pieces and write them down..   This might be one cut per length to get this piece, but you have on your spread sheet, what you have left (remainder of the length)
     Then you take the next longest required part,  either this comes out of a new length or one of the remainders from above.
      Pretty soon you have shorter and shorter lengths required for frame, but are taking these out of the remainders from above.

     This works for each tubing size…  it really works out well, of course what makes a mess, is if you cut a piece to full required  length and either have your measurement wrong, or  cut the piece wrong.  Either way, you soon learn to NOT DO THAT again.  ;-)  

     This works for any size of aircraft frame.  The pile of scrap left over is very small.

   Preplanning is your friend here for both time and dollars.

Best of success.
Thought a bit more on how I do this….if say I have 101” piece, left and I had three piece that added up to 100” I would most likely take advantage of the only one inch waste… but would go over all the parts, to see.  

The beauty of this, is that you can mix and match cut lengths to leave the least waste.

that’s all folks!
Scott
best email address:  irondesignairparts@gmail.com

Offline John Reinking

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 99
  • Total likes: 1
  • OS:
  • Windows NT 10.0 Windows NT 10.0
  • Browser:
  • Chrome 58.0.3029.96 Chrome 58.0.3029.96
  • Eagle Type: DE-E-72
Re: Tail post size
« Reply #5 on: May 09, 2017, 09:11:38 PM »
Thanks, Scott.  We novice builders put great regard to your more technical posts, they are very helpful.
Retired US Postal Service 6 years, Sport Pilot (Aeronca 1946), first time builder and enjoying every bit of it (well, there are those gussets).   married (49 years), have had the flying bug forever.       reinkings@comcast.net

Offline ultra

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 23
  • Total likes: 0
  • Newbie
  • OS:
  • Windows NT 10.0 Windows NT 10.0
  • Browser:
  • Chrome 57.0.2987.133 Chrome 57.0.2987.133
Re: Tail post size
« Reply #6 on: May 10, 2017, 08:36:10 AM »
Thanks, Scott.  We novice builders put great regard to your more technical posts, they are very helpful.

I found his CAD drawing especially helpful too.

 

EaglersNest Mission Statement:
To maintain the comprehensive searchable database resource for Builders and Fliers of Leonard Milholland ultralight airplane designs aka Legal Eagle Ultralights.

BetterHalfVW.com  becomes LegalEagleAirplane.com - stay in contact with Leonard and get plans for all the Milholland Designs at LegalEagleAirplane.com
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal